The standardized model of alcoholic anesthesia for the purposeful screening of analeptics

Authors

  • I. V. Kabachna National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine
  • S. M. Drogovoz National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine
  • V. I. Kabachnyy National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine
  • Yu. Yu. Serdiukova National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24959/cphj.17.1440

Keywords:

alcohol, anesthesia, heterocide, analeptic, awakening effect, respiratory rate, respiratory center

Abstract

The analysis of pathogenetic mechanisms of development of urgent conditions (anesthesia, asphyxia, hypoxia, shock, collapse, bacterial intoxication, poisoning by chemical compounds or drugs suppressing the function of the central nervous system) suggests that among urgent therapies analeptic drugs (AD) are of a paramount importance. At the same time, their assortment has not only been updated in the last 50 years, but reduced to 6 drugs. This situation is conditioned by the absence of the standard for selecting AD.

Aim. To create a standard for selecting AD which can quantitatively (statistically reliable) evaluate both the level of the awakening effect in general and its mechanism (namely its analeptic action); compare and determine the priorities of further study of substances; create theoretical foundations for the purposeful search of AD and optimize the scientific research.

Materials and methods. During the research the procedure of AD selection was developed experimentally. It consists in intraperitoneal introduction of the narcotic agent (ethanol) in the optimal dose; introduction of a classical analeptic sulfocamphocaine (SCC) in the standard dose at the peak of anesthesia to one group of mice, while the second group received the substance studied (Heterocide-31) with the subsequent recording of the anesthesia duration, dynamics of the frequency of respiratory movements, assessment of the psychomotor state and physiological functions of animals during anesthesia and after awakening assuming that in the course of the experiment the specific dose-time conditions for introduction of substances are observed.

Results. The results of the study show that the maximum efficacy (18.2 %) was achieved by Heterocide-31 in the dose of 1 mg / kg, while the optimal dose of SCC (20 mg / kg) accelerated awakening of animals by 19.5 %. Thus, Heterocide-31 showed almost identical activity in the concentration of 20 times lower than SCC. The fact that after introduction of Heterocide-31 the respiratory rate (RR4) significantly increases (p <0.05) by 1.6 times already within the first minute compared to the control group, and the maximum (125) respiratory movements / min in the reference drug group is achieved only in 6 min (RR5) indicates the 6-fold advantage of Heterocide-31 by the rate of the respiratory center stimulation and allows referring the latter to a number of promising analeptics.

Conclusions. The model of pharmacological screening proposed accelerates the purposeful search of original AD, has a complete novelty, originality, easy in repeatability, economic, environmental and humanistic advantages, namely it reduces time and the number of laboratory animals, the cost of experiments, increases the information value of the experiments. The method has been tested on heterosides and suggests that derivatives of sulfur and nitrogen-containing heterocycles are promising for the search of original AD having a significant advantage over classical analeptics.

Author Biographies

I. V. Kabachna, National University of Pharmacy

postgraduate student of the Department of Pharmacology

S. M. Drogovoz, National University of Pharmacy

Doctor of Medicine (Dr. habil.), professor of the Department of Pharmacology

V. I. Kabachnyy, National University of Pharmacy

Doctor of Pharmacy (Dr. habil.), professor, head of the Department of Physical and Colloid Chemistry

Yu. Yu. Serdiukova, National University of Pharmacy

Candidate of Pharmacy (Ph.D.), teaching assistant of the Department of Physical and Colloid Chemistry

References

Mashkovskii, M. D. (2014). Lekarstvennye sredstva. Мoscow, 1, 1216.

Harkevich, D. A. (2010). Farmakologiia, 10–е izd. Мoscow: GEOTAR–Media, 908.

Drohovoz, S. M., Shtrygol, S. Yu., Shchekina, E. G. (2013). Farmakologiia v pomoshch studentu, provizoru i vrachu. Kharkov: Titul, 900.

4. Sulfocamfokain (Sulfocamphocaine) instruktsiia po vykorystanniu. Available at: http://compendium.com.ua/search_full

Mironov, А. V. et al. (2012). Rukovodstvo po provedeniu doklinicheskikh issledovanii lekarstvennykh sredstv.Moscow, 312–317.

Gabriev, R. U. (2005). Rukovodstvo po eksperimentalnomu (doklinicheskomu) izycheniiu novykh farmakologicheskikh veshchestv, 2–izd.Moscow: Meditcina, 832.

Deacon, R. M. (2006). Housing, husbandry and handling of rodents for behavioral experiments. Nature Protocols, 1 (2), 936–946. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.120

Etyka likaria ta prava liudyny: polozhennia pro vykorystannia tvaryn u biomedychnykh tsiliakh. (2003). Eksperymentalna ta klinichna fiziolohiia i biokhimiia, 2 (22), 108–109.

Kabachna, І. V., Drohovoz, S. М., Kabachnyi, V. I., Palagina, N. Yu., Kabachnyi, V. V. (2017). Naukovyi zhurnal Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii, 25 (2 (91)). Kharkiv, 49–52.

Kabachna, І. V., Drohovoz, S. M., Kabachnyi, V. I.(2017). Sposib vidboru substantsii dlia tsilespriamovanoho poshuku oryhinalnykh biolohichno aktyvnykh spolyk z analeptychnoiu aktyvnistiu na modeli alkoholnoho narkozu. Prioritet–zaiavka na patent na vynakhid. № a 2017 07291; declared 20.07.2017, №288, 13.

Kabachna, І. V., Drohovoz, S. M., Kabachnyi, V. I.(2017). Sposib vidboru substantsii dlia tsilespriamovanoho poshuku oryhinalnykh biolohichno aktyvnykh spoluk analeptychnoi dii na modeli alkoholnoho narkozu. Kyiv, 6.

Vasilevich, N. V., Platoshkin, E. N., Zapolskii, D. V. (2012). Problemy zdorovia i ekologii, 4, 38–44.

Kabachna, І. V., Drohovoz, S. М., Kabachnyi, V. I., Storozhenko, О. М., Plakhotnaia, К. Yu.(2017). Analepticheskii skrining geterozidov na modeli ketaminovogo narkoza. Moscow, 292–293.

Kabachna, І. V., Palagina, N. Yu., Storozhenko, О. М. (2017). // Vliianie Geterozida–321 na dykhatelnyi tcentr na modeli propofolovogo narkoza.Dushanbe, 303.

Kabachna, І. V., Storozhenko, О. M., Kabachnyi, V. I., Plakhotnaia, K. Yu. (2016). Antinarkoznoe deistvie Geterozida–321 pri alkogolnoi intoksikatcii.Toshkent, 476–477.

Prozorovskii, V. B. (2005). Rukovodstvo po eksperimentalnomu (doklinicheskomu) izucheniiu novykh farmakologicheskikh veshchestv.Moscow: Remedium, 763–827.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-11

Issue

Section

Pre-clinical studies of new drugs