Mathematical modeling as the method of choice of the pharmacoeconomically reasonable regimen of the combined therapy of type 2 diabetes

Authors

  • T. I. Ivko National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Ukraine
  • T. A. Germanyuk National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24959/cphj.15.1354

Keywords:

diabetes mellitus, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, mathematical modeling

Abstract

The pharmacoeconomic study has been conducted with the purpose of scientific substantiation of the regimens of combined therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). The research subjects were 1792 inpatient medical histories of the patients with type 2 DM. These patients were treated at the Vinnytsia regional endocrinology clinic, endocrinology departments of the Khmelnytsky and Ternopol regional hospitals in 2011-2013. The following methods were used in the research: frequency analysis, ATC/DDD-analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, sensitivity analysis, mathematical modeling. As a result of the frequency analysis conducted it has been found that the following regimens of pharmacotherapy are the most frequently used: metformin + glimepiride applied in 45% of cases, gliclazide + metformin – in 14.5% of cases, metformin + glibenclamide – in 6.1% of cases. ATC/DDD-analysis has shown that the cost of DDD of metformin + glimepiride is ranged from 2.70 (Dianormet t.850 mg No.30 + Diapiryd 3 mg t.№30) tо 8.88 UAH (Siofor 500 mg t. No.60 + Amaril 2 mg t. No.30), metformin + gliclazide – from 3.29 (Diaformin 850 mg t. No.60 + Diaglizyd MR 30 mg t. No.60) to 9.43 UAH (Siofor 500 mg t. No.60 + Diabeton MR 60 mg t. No.30), metformin + glibenclamide – from 1.98 (Diaformin 850 mg t. No.60 + Glibenclamide 5 mg t. No.100) to 6.20 UAH (Siofor 500 mg t. No.60 + Maninil 3,5 mg t. No.120). The results obtained indicate the cost-effective and cost-utility advantages of the regimen of the combined therapy metformin + glibenclamide. The sensitivity analysis has shown stability of the pharmacoeconomic study results. The mathematical model of the "Decision Tree" that graphically shows the results of pharmacoeconomic studies has been constructed.

References

Глікозилювання білків при цукровому діабеті: феномен утворення та патогенетичні наслідки (огляд літератури) / Бойчук Т. М., Толстанов О. К., Грицюк М. І. [і інш.] // Актуальні проблеми транспортної медицини: навколишнє середовище; професійне здоров’я; патологія. – 2013. – № 3. – С. 52 – 59.

Уніфікований клінічний протокол первинної та вторинної (спеціалізованої) медичної допомоги [Електронний ресурс]: Наказ МОЗ України від 21.12.2012 р. № 1118 – Режим доступу: https://www.moz.gov.ua/docfiles/dod1118_2_2012.pdf

Куликов А. Ю. Методология моделирования в фармакоэкономике / А. Ю. Куликов, Т. Т. Нгуен, А. В. Тихомирова // Фармакоэкономика. – 2011. – № 4, Том 4. – С.8-16

Ягудина Р.И. Фармакоэкономика сахарного диабета второго типа. Р. И. Ягудина, А. Ю. Куликов, Е. Е. Аринина // М.: OOO "Медицинское информационное агентство", 2011. – с. – 4 – 66

ATC/DDD Index 2014. – [Eлектронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://www.whocc.no

Life expectancy 2012 – [Eлектронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: www.who.int/gho/mortality.../life_tables/.../en

Published

2015-09-10

Issue

Section

Pharmacoeconomics