The study of the influence of prosteks® drug, rectal suppositories, produced by “Biopharma”, pjsc on the turpentine prostatitis in rats

Authors

  • O. M. Shapoval National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine
  • S. Yu. Shtrygol National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine
  • V. L. Karbovskiy “Biopharma”, PJSC, Ukraine
  • I. A. Shevchuk “Biopharma”, PJSC, Ukraine
  • O. V. Kurkina “Biopharma”, PJSC, Ukraine
  • T. Ye. Makovska Main Military Medical Hospital, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24959/cphj.14.1310

Keywords:

chronic prostatitis, Prosteks®, prostateprotective action, turpentine prostatitis

Abstract

In this work the results of studying the influence of Prosteks® drug, rectal suppositories, produced by “Biopharma”, PJSC on the turpentine prostatitis in rats are presented. The relevance of the work is due to the fact that among the urological diseases in men older than 50 benign hyperplasia of prostate (BHP) and chronic prostatitis are the most common, and in 96.7% of patients with BPH the morphological signs of chronic prostatitis appear. A comparative evaluation of the therapeutic effect of a new drug and the reference drug “Prostatilen zinc”, rectal suppositories, concerning the influence on functional, biochemical and immunological parameters characterizing the functional state of the prostate gland has been carried out. Rectal introduction of turpentine to male rats 2 times causes severe abnormalities in the prostate condition. Treatment of male rats with Prosteks® in the dose of 168 mg/kg and Prostatilen zinc in the dose of 210 mg/kg had a strong prostateprotective action. According to its expressiveness Prosteks® drug, rectal suppositories, produced by “Biopharma”, PJSC is not inferior and even has the advantage by individual indicators over the reference drug “Prostatilen zinc”, rectal suppositories. Thus, Prosteks® drug, rectal suppositories, produced by “Biopharma”, PJSC can be considered promising for clinical trials with the purpose of further introduction into medical practice.

References

Доклінічні дослідження лікарських засобів: Метод. рекоменд. / За ред. чл.-кор. НАМН України О.В.Стефанова. – К.: Авіценна, 2001. – 528 с.

Мировая статистика здравоохранения за 2010 год. – Всемирная организация здравоохранения, 2010. – 177 с.

Сайдакова Н.О., Старцева Л.М., Кравчук Н.Г. Основні показники урологічної допомоги в Україні за 2005-06 роки: Відомче видання. – К., 2007. – 205 с.

Ткачук В.Н., Ткачук И.Н. Эффективность препарата «Витапрост форте» у больных с доброкачественной гиперплазией предстательной железы / Електронний ресурс. – Режим доступу: http://medi.ru/doc/g2401204.htm

Урология. Национальное руководство / Под ред. Н.А.Лопаткина. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2009. –

с.

Яковлєва Л.В., Лар’яновська Ю.Б., Міщенко О.Я. та ін. Доклінічне вивчення лікарських засобів, призначених для лікування простатитів: Метод. рекоменд. – К., 2005. – 35 с.

Drach G.W. // J. Urol. – 1998. – Vol. 120. – P. 288.

Emberton M., Andriole G., De la Rosette I. et al. // Urol. – 2003. – Vol. 61. – P. 267-273.

Kavasmaa O.T., Tyomkin D.B., Mehik A. et al. // World J. Surg. Oncol. – 2013. – №5. – Р. 211-258.

Krieger J.N. // J. Androl. – 1996. – Vol. 17. – P. 310-340.

Luo G.C., Foo K.T., Kuo T., Tan G. // Singapore Med. J. – 2013. – Vol. 54, №9. – P. 482-486.

Schroder F., Altwein I. Development of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. In book: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. A Diagnosis and Treatment Primer. – Oxford, 1992. – P. 31-50.

Wan C.D., Zhou J.B., Song Y.P. et al. // Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. – 2013. –Vol. 19, №10. – P. 912-917.

Published

2014-09-12

Issue

Section

Pre-clinical studies of new drugs